Not really, if I was using COPY I wouldn't need the transaction. The
reason I use the transaction is to make the inserts faster, not for any
integrity issues.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > To answer your question. I have a order system on my local Postgres
> (for multiple clients 50+), and need to have an offsite independent
> database to drive orders for a website (for one client).
>
>> None of the replication solutions I have seen (at a resonable price)
>> allow me to limit the data being replicated by a specific field
>> (which I must do from a liability standpoint), so I'm rolling my own
>> replication using php as the scripting language. I've got the data
>> being transferred using inserts just fine, but I would suspect a
>> 50-300% improvement in transfer speed if I could resort to COPY
>> instead (I'm inserting records in transactions of 500 rows each for
>> testing). One of the tables that I need to replicate is a
>
>
>
> You would definatley see an improvement from using COPY but you could
> have other problems. COPY does not happen within a transaction block
> it just kind of shoves everything in there. You are going to be better
> served in
> the long run doing inserts.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Joshua Drake
>
>
>
>> Multi-Gig table (which is about the same size as all the others
>> combined).
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Why in the world would you want to do this? It seems that there
>>> should be a better way.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Joshua Drake
>>>
>>> DeJuan Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know how to execute a COPY from PHP?
>>>> I keep getting parse errors on all the data.
>>>>
>>>> PHP 4.3.2
>>>> PostgreSQL 7.3.4
>>>>
>>>> example:
>>>>
>>>> CREATE table tmp(data text);
>>>>
>>>> COPY tmp FROM STDIN;
>>>> test1
>>>> test2
>>>> test3
>>>> \.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>>> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>