Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CC748A3.22170450@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vote on SET in aborted transaction (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Right offhand, I am not seeing anything here for which there's a > compelling case not to roll it back on error. > > In fact, I have yet to hear *any* plausible example of a variable > that we would really seriously want not to roll back on error. Honetsly I don't understand what kind of example you expect. How about the following ? [The curren schema is schema1] begin;create schema foo;set search_path = foo;create table t1 (....);. [error occurs]rollback;insert into t1 select * fromschema1.t1; Should the search_path be put back in this case ? As I mentioned already many times, it doesn't seem *should be* kind of thing. regards, Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: