Vote on SET in aborted transaction
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Vote on SET in aborted transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200204231627.g3NGRVq11398@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
OK, would people please vote on how to handle SET in an aborted transaction? This vote will allow us to resolve the issue and move forward if needed. In the case of: SET x=1;BEGIN;SET x=2;query_that_aborts_transaction;SET x=3;COMMIT; at the end, should 'x' equal:1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort3- All SETs are honored in aborted transaction? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable Our current behavior is 2. Please vote and I will tally the results. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: