Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C4D08CA.1B8EA385@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Список | pgsql-general |
> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. While the > GPL has similar goals, PostgreSQL developers find the restrictions > imposed by the GPL to be unacceptable. Since the BSD license has no > such restrictions, we like it and have no intention of changing it. *I* don't find GPL unacceptable. Some of my favorite software (present company excepted of course) has it. But I am and have always been satisfied that the BSD license (predating GPL as Don points out) serves Postgres and PostgreSQL just fine. I've always considered it a point of recognition that we retain the licensing that Berkeley was kind enough to give us. It *is* one of the great licenses in the history of open software. So why are we having to justify it? - Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: