Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13641.1011687893@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes: > I've always considered it a point of recognition that we retain the > licensing that Berkeley was kind enough to give us. It *is* one of the > great licenses in the history of open software. Agreed entirely. > So why are we having to justify it? We're not "justifying" it; we're trying to compose a FAQ entry that might stave off a few askings of this all-too-frequently-asked question. FAQs exist to save people time, not to "justify" things. And this issue certainly has come up often enough to merit a FAQ entry. Basically, I think we want a reasonably polite version of "it's been discussed, it's been agreed to, it's not open to further discussion; now go away" ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: