Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: problems with new vacuum (??) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C3352BB.5020008@pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: problems with new vacuum (??) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: >>In my experience enabling this feature can make a huge improvement in I/O >>intensive applications. Other options can help also, but I find dma to have >>the largest impact. I find linux almost unusable without it. >> > > Oh, I should mention my BSD/OS data point is with one SCSI disk, soft > updates and tagged queuing enabled. If Tom's system is IDE-based and he's not explicitly enabled DMA then this alone would explain the difference you two are seeing, just as the poster above is implying. I have one system with an older 15GB disk that causes a kernel panic if I try to enable DMA, and I see the kind of system performance issues described by Tom on that system. On my main server downtown (SCSI) and my normal desktop (two IDE drives that do work properly with DMA enabled) things run much, much better when there's a lot of disk I/O going on. These are all Linux systems, not BSD... -- Don Baccus Portland, OR http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: