Re: FAQ: Current state of replication ?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FAQ: Current state of replication ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3AB6F038.ED6D7CF4@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | FAQ: Current state of replication ? ("Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowledge.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: FAQ: Current state of replication ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> What is the current state-of-the-art WRT replication of any sort ? If anyone > has homebrew solutions that they can share, we would welcome tyring too. There is some code in contrib/rserv for 7.1 which does table replication. It has some restrictions, but does implement the basic concept. I think a tarball to do the same for 7.0 and earlier is available at www.pgsql.com (just Makefile differences). We are currently working through the issues involved with multi-slave replication and the ramifications for failover to (one of) the slaves. It looks like the rserv code may assume too much independence between slaves and replication sync information, and failover may be not-quite-right in those cases. Will be posting to the list when we know the answer (though contributions and inputs are of course always welcome!). afaict changes in rserv schema, if necessary, will not be available for 7.1, but we'll be posting patches and updating the CVS tree. btw, it looks like TODO.detail/replication predates the replication implementation, and has no real relationship with the implementation. There is some thought that WAL/BAR features can help support replication at a different level than is done now, but that is work for the future afaik. - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: