Re: Why vacuum?
От | mlw |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why vacuum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3A38C6FD.3F519E6@mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why vacuum? (bpalmer <bpalmer@crimelabs.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why vacuum?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Martin A. Marques" wrote: > > El Mié 13 Dic 2000 16:41, bpalmer escribió: > > I noticed the other day that one of my pg databases was slow, so I ran > > vacuum on it, which brought a question to mind: why the need? I looked > > at my oracle server and we aren't doing anything of the sort (that I can > > find), so why does pg need it? Any info? > > I know nothing about Oracle, but I can tell you that Informix has an update > statistics, which I don't know if it's similar to vacuum, but.... > What vacuum does is clean the database from rows that were left during > updates and deletes, non the less, the tables get shrincked, so searches get > faster. > While I would like Postgres to perform statistics, one and a while, on it own. I like vacuum in general. I would rather trade unused disk space for performace. The last thing you need during high loads is the database thinking that it is time to clean up. -- http://www.mohawksoft.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: