Re: Why vacuum?
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why vacuum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001214093855.B4589@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why vacuum? (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> [001214 09:30] wrote: > "Martin A. Marques" wrote: > > > > El Mié 13 Dic 2000 16:41, bpalmer escribió: > > > I noticed the other day that one of my pg databases was slow, so I ran > > > vacuum on it, which brought a question to mind: why the need? I looked > > > at my oracle server and we aren't doing anything of the sort (that I can > > > find), so why does pg need it? Any info? > > > > I know nothing about Oracle, but I can tell you that Informix has an update > > statistics, which I don't know if it's similar to vacuum, but.... > > What vacuum does is clean the database from rows that were left during > > updates and deletes, non the less, the tables get shrincked, so searches get > > faster. > > > > While I would like Postgres to perform statistics, one and a while, on > it own. I like vacuum in general. > > I would rather trade unused disk space for performace. The last thing > you need during high loads is the database thinking that it is time to > clean up. Even worse is having to scan a file that has grown 20x the size because you havne't vacuum'd in a while. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: