Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts)
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39AAAF7D.2B98B14B@tm.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance on inserts (Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > > That syntax is a lot like a real SQL9x INSERT. > > Multiple row constructors in INSERT is one of my to-do items for the > planned querytree redesign. I have not thought it was worth messing > with until we're ready to bite that bullet, however. What is the status of this querytree redesign ? I'v spent some time trying to get a grip ofthe _exact_ meaning of the WITH RECURSIVE syntax in SQL3/99 as I badly need it in a project of mine. (I know the _general_ meaning - it is for querying tree-structured data ;) The things the new querytree should address sould be (at least ;) - 1. OUTER JOINS 2. WITH RECURSIVE 3. Support for positioned UPDATE & DELETE (requires probably lot more than just querytree redesign) 4. Easyer special-casing of optimisations (like using an index on x for 'select max(x) from t', but not for 'select max(x)from t where n=7' Is the special mailing-list for querytree redesing active ? -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: