Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 397E7D7C.6FA4C5AE@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source (Joe Brenner <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > $ wc InterBase/dsql/parse.y > > 4217 13639 103059 InterBase/dsql/parse.y > > $ wc postgresql-7.0.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y > > 5858 20413 149104 postgresql-7.0.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y > > Hmm. I suspect that I could shrink our gram.y by ~25% just by removing > comments and C support routines, and by consolidating some execution > blocks onto fewer lines. Does it look like their parse.y is more dense > than ours, do they do a lot of postprocessing to eliminate the yacc > rules, or have we missed the boat on writing the grammar in yacc? > > Just curious; I probably won't look myself since I don't want to run the > risk of compromising our code and licensing. Or is that not an issue > with the Inprise license? I had a bit of a look. There's no obvious reason, just maybe postgres has a few more comments and a bit more code inside the action blocks. No obvious problem here. It would be a pity if we can't look and learn from Interbase in this instance, because this is one area where there is at least a possibility of borrowing something useful.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: