Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
От | Joe Brenner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200007272044.NAA47930@kzsu.stanford.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au> wrote: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > > Just curious; I probably won't look myself since I don't want to run the > > risk of compromising our code and licensing. Or is that not an issue > > with the Inprise license? > > I had a bit of a look. There's no obvious reason, just maybe postgres > has a few more comments and a bit more code inside the action blocks. No > obvious problem here. > > It would be a pity if we can't look and learn from Interbase in this > instance, because this is one area where there is at least a possibility > of borrowing something useful. Well, the license is just the Mozilla Public License with the names changed. I've just read through it several times, and I think the main trouble with it is you probably really do need to have a lawyer look at it... but I think you could go as far as to include some of the Inprise source files into postgresql: http://www.inprise.com/IPL.html 3.7. Larger Works. You may create a Larger Work by combining Covered Code with other code not governed by the termsof this License and distribute the Larger Work as a single product. In such a case, You must make sure the requirementsof this License are fulfilled for the Covered Code. The requirements seem to be pretty commonsense things... If you use some source code from Inprise, you've got to keep track of where the source came from, label it with their license, list any modifications you've made, always provide the source with any executables, etc. There's also a bunch of stuff about how this license doesn't release you from any third party intellectual property claims (duh! Legal docs always seem to state the obvious at great length). I might wonder what would happen if Borland owned a software patent on some algorithm that's included in this code... But no, I *think* that's a non-issue: The Initial Developer hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license, subject to third party intellectualproperty claims:
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: