Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38C5EB5F.CFCA1617@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I will fight this to my death. :-) > I have cursed Ingres every time I needed to look at the Ingres data > directory to find out which tables match which files. Even a lookup > file is a pain. Right now, I can do ls -l to see which tables are > taking disk space. I had Ingres also, and found their scheme to be a royal pain. But that was really only because they had such a *bad* schema that I'd have to poke around forever to reconstruct a query which would give me file names and table names. And then I'd have to print that and compare that to the directories which were buried way down in a directory tree. But with Postgres, we can write a utility to do this for us, so I think that it isn't so much of an issue. In fact, perhaps we could have a backend function which could do this, so we could query the sizes directly. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: