Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200003080554.AAA15390@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I will fight this to my death. :-) > > I have cursed Ingres every time I needed to look at the Ingres data > > directory to find out which tables match which files. Even a lookup > > file is a pain. Right now, I can do ls -l to see which tables are > > taking disk space. > > I had Ingres also, and found their scheme to be a royal pain. But that > was really only because they had such a *bad* schema that I'd have to > poke around forever to reconstruct a query which would give me file > names and table names. And then I'd have to print that and compare > that to the directories which were buried way down in a directory > tree. > > But with Postgres, we can write a utility to do this for us, so I > think that it isn't so much of an issue. In fact, perhaps we could > have a backend function which could do this, so we could query the > sizes directly. Does not work if the table was accidentally deleted. Also requires the backend to be running. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: