Re: [HACKERS] backend startup
От | Chris Bitmead |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] backend startup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38A1EAE0.CB043183@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] backend startup (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] backend startup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote: > > At 05:50 PM 2/9/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote: > > > >Is there any particular reason why a backend has to be started by the > >postmaster unless it is the only backend running (in debug mode) ? > > > >I'm thinking here that > > > >(a) It would be more convenient to debug if you didn't have to shut down > >the postmaster to run gdb postgres and... > > > >(b) If that were the case you be part-way to implementing a > >single-process database option like some databases have. > > I can see where (a) is true, but who really cares about (b) any > more? NT, BSD, or Linux on a several hundred dollar PC has no problem > with dozens of processes... Well there is socket overhead and extra context-switching time.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: