Re: [HACKERS] backend startup
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] backend startup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000209075427.0109c140@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | backend startup (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 05:50 PM 2/9/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote: > >Is there any particular reason why a backend has to be started by the >postmaster unless it is the only backend running (in debug mode) ? > >I'm thinking here that > >(a) It would be more convenient to debug if you didn't have to shut down >the postmaster to run gdb postgres and... > >(b) If that were the case you be part-way to implementing a >single-process database option like some databases have. I can see where (a) is true, but who really cares about (b) any more? NT, BSD, or Linux on a several hundred dollar PC has no problem with dozens of processes... - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: