Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 38834477.B9037F62@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The official SQL data types are "timestamp" and > "interval", right? Everything else will eventually be an alias or > phased out or whatever? No (at least I haven't proposed that). abstime stays as a 4-byte internal system time type. timestamp and interval become full-featured date/time types, stealing all of the datetime and timespan code, and the latter two become synonyms for timestamp and interval. > I've been itching to change the pg_shadow.valuntil column to timestamp > anyway, I suppose that would be a step in the right direction, or not? At the moment, there are *no* 8-byte date/time types in the system tables. This would be the first instance of that, and I'm not sure we should introduce it in just one place. Has abstime been a problem here? - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: