Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37E4FC3E.29CA62E8@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Using the exact same data, and the exact same queries (dbi is cool): > MySQL: 0.498u 0.150s 0:02.50 25.6% 10+1652k 0+0io 0pf+0w > PgSQL: 0.494u 0.061s 0:19.78 2.7% 10+1532k 0+0io 0pf+0w > >From the 'time' numbers, MySQL is running ~17sec faster, but uses up 23% > more CPU to do this...so where is our slowdown? I don't remember if you gave details on the sizes of tables, but in any case I'm going to guess that you are spending almost all of your time in the optimizer. Try manipulating the parameters to force the genetic optimizer and see if it helps. Lots of quals but only two tables gives you a non-optimal case for the default exhaustive optimizer. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: