Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27446.937756980@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL? (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> Using the exact same data, and the exact same queries (dbi is cool): >> MySQL: 0.498u 0.150s 0:02.50 25.6% 10+1652k 0+0io 0pf+0w >> PgSQL: 0.494u 0.061s 0:19.78 2.7% 10+1532k 0+0io 0pf+0w >>>> From the 'time' numbers, MySQL is running ~17sec faster, but uses up 23% >> more CPU to do this...so where is our slowdown? > I don't remember if you gave details on the sizes of tables, but in > any case I'm going to guess that you are spending almost all of your > time in the optimizer. No --- if he were, it'd be all CPU time, not 2.7% CPU usage. The time's got to be going into disk accesses. I'm perfectly prepared to blame the optimizer, but I think it's because of a bad plan not too much time spent making the plan... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: