Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37D6B33D.BB619EA0@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > pg_upgrade will not work in converting from <= 6.4.* to 6.5.* because > the on-disk date format changed in 6.5. Hopefully, 6.6 will allow > pg_upgrade for 6.5.* databases. We try not to change the on-disk > format, but sometimes we have to. MVCC required it for 6.5.*. Ok, answers my question. It would be nice to be able to say: pg_upgrade --source-pgdata=/var/lib/pgsql-old --pgdata=/var/lib/pgsql and have any version PostgreSQL database converted to the newest, but maybe that's a pipe dream. Sure would make upgrades easier, on everybody, not just RedHatters -- such as those who have large amounts of large objects. If I were a better C coder, and had more experience with the various versions' on-disk formats, I'd be happy to try to tackle it myself. But, I'm not that great of a C coder, nor do I know the data structures well enough. Oh well. Thanks much! Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: