Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199909081905.PAA18895@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PG_UPGRADE status? (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote: > > pg_upgrade will not work in converting from <= 6.4.* to 6.5.* because > > the on-disk date format changed in 6.5. Hopefully, 6.6 will allow > > pg_upgrade for 6.5.* databases. We try not to change the on-disk > > format, but sometimes we have to. MVCC required it for 6.5.*. > > Ok, answers my question. It would be nice to be able to say: > pg_upgrade --source-pgdata=/var/lib/pgsql-old --pgdata=/var/lib/pgsql > and have any version PostgreSQL database converted to the newest, but > maybe that's a pipe dream. Sure would make upgrades easier, on > everybody, not just RedHatters -- such as those who have large amounts > of large objects. > > If I were a better C coder, and had more experience with the various > versions' on-disk formats, I'd be happy to try to tackle it myself. > But, I'm not that great of a C coder, nor do I know the data structures > well enough. Oh well. You would have to convert tons of rows of data in raw format. Seems like dump/reload would be easier. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: