Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
От | Uncle George |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3798514B.5581E6D4@voicenet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
Список | pgsql-ports |
Thanks, But I think that a computer has no right to any "damn order" it wants to, particular if its the same src & test facilities. gat shutup HAL, you will get you're chance to talk to these guys later. Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > The SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail >= 2; > > first give a sh3, and then a sh1. > > BTW this appears to work on the redhat/i386 port . SO where has my > > alpha gone wrong :-( > > It's not wrong. If there is no explicit order-by, your system is > entitled to return results in any damn order it wants to. The result > as a set is quite correct (barring other unreported troubles)...
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: