Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920606142214i6a6532f3k1a895a784f7b16dc@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp
Re: Postgres fsync off (not needed) with NetApp |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 14 Jun 2006 23:33:53 -0400, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote: > In fact the benefit of the NVRAM is precisely that it makes sure you *don't* > have any reason to turn fsync off. It should make the fsync essentially free. Having run PostgreSQL on a NetApp with input from NetApp, this is correct. fsync should be turned on, but you will not incur the *real* direct-to-disk cost of the sync, it will be direct-to-NVRAM. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: