Re: reindexdb command utlility
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reindexdb command utlility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3677.1149700621@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reindexdb command utlility (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: reindexdb command utlility
Re: reindexdb command utlility |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I thought it needed changing for consistency. Shouldn't status messages > like this be INFO: > test=> REINDEX DATABASE test; > NOTICE: table "pg_class" was reindexed > If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO. Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE. If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used. But it doesn't (and this is not a request to add one). Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages. NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one. But not INFO. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: