Re: reindexdb command utlility
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reindexdb command utlility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200606071702.k57H28l06437@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reindexdb command utlility (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: reindexdb command utlility
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Patch applied. Thanks. > > Why is this an improvement? AFAIR an INFO message is *not suppressible* > by adjusting client_min_messages, therefore this makes the system more > chatty not less so. It certainly doesn't do anything to address the > original complaint. I thought it needed changing for consistency. Shouldn't status messages like this be INFO: test=> REINDEX DATABASE test; NOTICE: table "pg_class" was reindexed NOTICE: table "sql_languages" was reindexed NOTICE: table "sql_packages" was reindexed NOTICE: table "sql_parts" was reindexed If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: