Re: psql patch: new host/port
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql patch: new host/port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3120.24.211.165.134.1134390776.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql patch: new host/port (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql patch: new host/port
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Glaesemann said: > > On Dec 12, 2005, at 20:33 , Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Michael Glaesemann wrote: >>> I'm not familiar enough with the psql code to be able to tell, but is >>> this secure? The pg_hba.conf on the new server is enforced, I assume? >> >> You don't need to be familiar with the psql code to know that it would >> be pretty stupid if client programs could override the server >> authentication setup. > > I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. My point was I'm not familiar enough > with the code to see if this implementation is secure. I do indeed > realize that clients bypassing server authentication is a Bad Thing. > The patch is to the client only, not even to libpq, so of course no auth bypass is involved. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: