registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA6F@cuthbert.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
To all: I think there are a couple of things about this issue that have not been completely thought out. Moving off of an environment based home variable should not be taken lightly. Switching the runtime environment variables to use the registry will have several unintended consequences: 1. There are several warnings and messages in postgres that explicitly make reference to environment variables...these now have to be changed for the win32 port. 2. Application software written in C for PostgreSQL ported from unix may not necessarily work anymore (assumptions about PGDATA). 3. Just like the registry, the env has a system and a user area to make settings. By default, mysql puts it home directory into the system area. Nobody on the mysql lists seems to have a problem with this. 4. Manipulating the environment is generally easier (either using SET or parameter invocation from the command line) and has little/no win32 centric coding. 5. The PeerDirect port uses environment settings, and I found it easy to work with...why fix something that isn't broken? Regards, Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: