Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28008.1074880932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com> writes:
> I think there are a couple of things about this issue that have not been
> completely thought out. Moving off of an environment based home
> variable should not be taken lightly. Switching the runtime environment
> variables to use the registry will have several unintended consequences:
I agree that we do not want to start hacking the parts of the code that
depend on environment variables. A reasonable compromise would probably
be to have a small chunk of Windows-specific code at startup that reads
the registry and installs the values it finds there by doing putenv().
Thereafter everything operates the same as on Unix.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: