Re: pg_backup symlink?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_backup symlink? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20000711083311.029f4450@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_backup symlink? (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_backup symlink?
Re: pg_backup symlink? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 00:24 11/07/00 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >Philip Warner writes: > >> Does anyone have a philosophical objection to a symlink from pg_dump to >> (new) pg_backup? > >Yes. The behaviour of a program should not depend on the name used to >invoke it. You can use shell aliases or scripts for that. OK, I suppose I was thinking of the pg_dump symlink as a tool for compatibility. Is there a good solution? It dumps to text for compatibility with the old pg_dump, but I will most often use 'pg_dump -Fc --blob'. Is there a recommended 'correct' approach? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: