pg_backup symlink?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | pg_backup symlink? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20000710134236.009b8860@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_backup symlink?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Does anyone have a philosophical objection to a symlink from pg_dump to (new) pg_backup? The reason I ask is that with the new BLOB support, to do a proper backup of the database one has to type: pg_dump --blob -Fc ...etc where --blob tells it to dump BLOBs and -Fc tells it to use the custon file format, which at the moment is the only one that supports BLOB storage. The idea would be for pg_dump to look at it's name, and make --blob and -Fc defaults if it is called as pg_backup. These can of course be overridden when binary blob load direct into psql is supported (maybe 'LO_COPY from stdin Length {len}'?) I know someone (Tom?) objected to symlinked files drastically changing command behaviour, but this is not a drastic change, so I live in hope. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: