Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20001127184007.01480920@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 09:30 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Well, true, but when you have 256 MB or a half-gig or more to devote to >> the cache, you get plenty of blocks, and in pre-PG 7.1 the 8KB limit is a >> pain for a lot of folks. > >Agreed. The other problem is that most people have 2-4MB of cache, so a >32k default would be too big for them. I've always been fine with the default, and in fact agree with it. The OpenACS project recommends a 16KB default for PG 7.0, but that's only so we can hold reasonable-sized lzText strings in forum tables, etc. I was only lamenting the fact that the world seems to have the impression that it's not a default, but rather a hard-wired limit. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: