Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200011280230.VAA01573@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> At 08:39 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > >> If it breaks anything in PostgreSQL I sure haven't seen any evidence -- the > >> box this database is running on gets hit pretty hard and I haven't had a > >> single ounce of trouble since I went to 7.0.X > > > >Larger block sizes mean larger blocks in the cache, therefore fewer > >blocks per megabyte. The more granular the cache, the better. > > Well, true, but when you have 256 MB or a half-gig or more to devote to > the cache, you get plenty of blocks, and in pre-PG 7.1 the 8KB limit is a > pain for a lot of folks. Agreed. The other problem is that most people have 2-4MB of cache, so a 32k default would be too big for them. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: