Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000821065906.014e8e00@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) (Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:22 PM 8/20/00 -0400, Ned Lilly wrote: >If you all don't mind, I think it'd be great to keep this discussion on the >list. As some of you know, Great Bridge is working on its own project >hosting site (including a PG-backed bug tracking module). We're not quite >ready to pull back the curtain yet, but are getting close, and will be >actively soliciting input (and hacks) from the community. So - again - why roll your own instead of build upon a base which at least is already seeing some use, by some fairly large organizations (arsDigita is larger and more deeply funded than Great Bridge, making profits to boot, and I won't even start talking about AOL)? arsDigita is putting some developer effort into the SDM, so it's no longer just Ben and whoever he can rope into helping out. Couldn't you guys more profitably spend time, say, working on outer joins rather than doing something like this? The folks working on the SDM have a LOT more web/db development experience than whoever's rolling your bug tracking system. I keep sniffing the odor of NIH ... - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: