Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000615054049.011bcec0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: Big 7.1 open items (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:04 AM 6/15/00 +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > >> In reality, very few people are going to be interested in restoring >> a table in a way that breaks referential integrity and other >> normal assumptions about what exists in the database. > >This is not true. In my DBA history it would have saved me manweeks >of work if an easy and efficient restore of one single table from backup >would have been available in Informix and Oracle. >We allways had to restore most of the whole system to another machine only >to get back at some table info that would then be manually re-added >to the production system. I'm missing something, I guess. You would do a createdb, do a filesystem copy of pg_log and one file into it, and then read data from the tablewithout having to restore the other tables in the database? I'm just curious - when was the last time you restored a Postgres database in this piecemeal manner, and how often do you do it? - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: