Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] "DML" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.19990611094944.00748390@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] "DML" (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 04:28 PM 6/11/99 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: >Would it be acceptable to replace "DML statement" with something like >"data-altering statement"? The phrase shows up in only two places in >our ~700 pages of docs and out of context it doesn't seem to add >value... It would probably be OK. DML seems to be one of those terms of art, not using it would seem odd to db geeks but they'd understand what you're saying. Using it is incomprehensible to the rest of us. So I'd vote for writing something non-experts can understand. Experts don't need your docs anyway :) - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: