Re: Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2e5ca697-a6a8-7d9a-0a2b-9c69dc3d59b4@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Include rust as an externally maintained procedural language
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 8/11/23 2:46 PM, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/external-pl.html > Description: > > The documentation [1] contains a list of independently maintained procedural > languages. Recently, PL/Rust [2] has reached its version 1.0 [3] and appears > to be stable. > > Major companies have expressed interest in the extension. Kiwi Copple, the > founder of Supabase, has stated his company is researching the language for > his platform [4]. Meanwhile, Amazon's RDS team has already announced support > for PL/Rust as a trusted language extension [5] on their PostgreSQL > instances [6]. > > Considering the increasing support and stability for PL/Rust, it should be > referenced within Postgresql's docs [1]. There's an up-to-date list of the different PL's in on this page in the wiki: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PL_Matrix Similar to this thread[1], I wonder if we just link to the wiki from the documentation, given it will be easier to maintain the list from there. Thanks, Jonathan [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/169165415312.635.10247434927885764880%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: