Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Tony Lausin |
---|---|
Тема | Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 296cdcaf0604300401x7dfee354lfe0395aa1c04c886@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello all, I'm working on a CMS which requires an open source database capable of handling hundreds of thousands of users simultaneously, with a high rate of database writes, and without buckling. We're talking somewhere between nerve.com/catch27.com and xanga.com/friendster.com PostgreSQL is a personal favorite of mine, and my gut instinct is that it's the best choice for a large scale CMS serving many users; however, I'm getting antsy. I keep getting suggestions that Postgres is really only suited to small and medium projects, and that I should be looking at MySQL for a large scale database drive site. I'm not really a fan of MySQL, but I'll consider it if it truly is the better choice in this case. I just don't understand how it would be. I'm thinking this is solely in reference to VACUUM. Even with autovacuum suport, I tend to agree there is at least one handicap. I could really use some enlightenment on just where PostgreSQL fits in a single-server, highly-trafficked web site serving mostly text, pictures and possibly streaming media. Regards, Anthony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: