Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27003.1146413267@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS? ("Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is PostgreSQL an easy choice for a large CMS?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Tony Lausin" <tonylausin@gmail.com> writes: > I'm working on a CMS which requires an open source database capable of > handling hundreds of thousands of users simultaneously, with a high > rate of database writes, and without buckling. We're talking somewhere > between nerve.com/catch27.com and xanga.com/friendster.com > PostgreSQL is a personal favorite of mine, and my gut instinct is that > it's the best choice for a large scale CMS serving many users; > however, I'm getting antsy. I keep getting suggestions that Postgres > is really only suited to small and medium projects, and that I should > be looking at MySQL for a large scale database drive site. [ rotfl... ] MySQL will fall over under any heavy concurrent-write scenario. It's conceivable that PG won't do what you need either, but if not I'm afraid you're going to be forced into Oracle or one of the other serious-money DBs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: