Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28853.928939702@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Done. Removed -O2 for linux_alpha and made it -O. I can not make the > other changes because that is generated by GNU autoconf. config.sub and config.guess are not auto-generated. What we have already done a couple of times is to apply suggested fixes to our current copies of these files, but to ask the submitter to send the bug report to the GNU folks as well (autoconf@gnu.org and bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu) so that it gets into future GNU releases. We do not want to maintain a divergent version of these files. I think someone remarked a few days ago that they had access to a more up-to-date version of the config scripts than was present in the last Autoconf release (2.13). Maybe we should try to grab the latest GNU sources of these files? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: