Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28775.957476941@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: pg_group_name_index corrupt? ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > Why does pg_group exist under $PGDATA though the indexes exist > under each $PGDATA/base/db_name ? > Could it be consistent on all databases ? Oh my, I think you've got it! The indexes must be SharedSystemRelations!! Backend 1 in database regression: regression=# vacuum analyze pg_group; VACUUM Backend 2 in database other is also happy: other=# vacuum analyze pg_group; VACUUM Now create a group with backend 1: regression=# create group g; CREATE GROUP Backend 1 sees the index entries: regression=# vacuum analyze pg_group; VACUUM But backend 2 doesn't: other=# vacuum analyze pg_group; NOTICE: Index pg_group_sysid_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1). Recreate the index. NOTICE: Index pg_group_name_index: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (0) IS NOT THE SAME AS HEAP' (1). Recreate the index. VACUUM pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought it did but they seem to have been disabled. Can you say "one more initdb"? I knew you could... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: