Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Why does pg_group exist under $PGDATA though the indexes exist
> > under each $PGDATA/base/db_name ?
> > Could it be consistent on all databases ?
> 
> Oh my, I think you've got it!  The indexes must be SharedSystemRelations!!
> 
...
> 
> pg_shadow would have the same problem if it had indices, which I thought
> it did but they seem to have been disabled.
> 
> Can you say "one more initdb"?  I knew you could...

You know, I am reading through this message, and thinking, gee, how is
he going to get out of this without initdb?  Well I have my answer.



--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026