Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2840051.1675720868@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 2023-02-06 Mo 11:13, Tom Lane wrote: >> So presumably, changing this test would break it for OpenSSL 0.9.8, >> which is still nominally supported in those branches. On the other >> hand, this test isn't run by default, so users would likely never >> notice anyway. > Presumably we don't have any buildfarm animals running with such old > versions of openssl, or they would be failing the same test on release > >= 13. That test isn't run by default in the buildfarm either, no? But indeed, probably nobody in the community is testing such builds at all. I did have such setups on my old dinosaur BF animals, but they bit the dust last year for unrelated reasons. I wonder how realistic it is to claim that we still support those old OpenSSL versions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: