Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28277.980478809@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] (Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de> writes: > I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely > smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the same behaviour that I saw > when running make installcheck (76 successful most of the time, > sometimes you get 75 out of 76 with random being the one that fails). Er, you do realize that the random test is *supposed* to fail every so often? (Else it'd not be random...) See the pages on interpreting regression test results in the admin guide. What troubles me is the nonrepeatable failures you saw on other tests. As Peter says, if "make installcheck" (serial tests) is perfectly solid and "make check" (parallel tests) is not, that suggests some kind of interprocess locking problem. But we haven't heard about any such issue on Solaris. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: