Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010126152959.C8925@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:13:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de> writes: > > I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely > > smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the same behaviour that I saw > > when running make installcheck (76 successful most of the time, > > sometimes you get 75 out of 76 with random being the one that fails). > > Er, you do realize that the random test is *supposed* to fail every so > often? (Else it'd not be random...) See the pages on interpreting > regression test results in the admin guide. > > What troubles me is the nonrepeatable failures you saw on other tests. > As Peter says, if "make installcheck" (serial tests) is perfectly solid > and "make check" (parallel tests) is not, that suggests some kind of > interprocess locking problem. But we haven't heard about any such issue > on Solaris. Or simply running out of processes - check maxproc? (Deleted beginning of this thread, so may have missed something) Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: