Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28064113-68CD-4C6E-BB6B-5E70C640F7D7@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions (a.imamov@postgrespro.ru) |
Ответы |
Re: Potential issue in ecpg-informix decimal converting functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 22 Feb 2024, at 17:54, a.imamov@postgrespro.ru wrote: > PGTYPESnumeric_to_int() and PGTYPESnumeric_to_long() > functions return only 0 or -1. So ECPG_INFORMIX_NUM_OVERFLOW can never > be returned. Indeed, this looks like an oversight. > I think dectoint(), dectolong() and PGTYPESnumeric_to_int() functions > should be a little bit different like in proposing patch. > What do you think? - Convert a variable to type decimal to an integer. + Convert a variable of type decimal to an integer. While related, this should be committed and backpatched regardless. + int errnum = 0; Stylistic nit, we typically don't initialize a variable which cannot be accessed before being set. Overall the patch looks sane, please register it for the next commitfest to make it's not missed. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: