Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27516.1194542988@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted ("Daniel Cristian Cruz" <cruz@senai-sc.ind.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Daniel Cristian Cruz" <cruz@senai-sc.ind.br> writes: > A few moments ago I got the following message, but didn't found any > reference on the internet (including lists). > Nov 8 13:50:56 SERVER postgres[18874]: [5-1] user=XXX,db=XXXPANIC: hash > table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted > The error showed after some query that where logged because were slow (more > than 5 seconds), in which they had a very big list of values in a NOT IN > clause (not sure if this caused the problem). > I don't know if this is a bug or not. Well, it shouldn't have happened, so either it's a bug or you had a hardware glitch. But unless you can find a way to reproduce it I'm not sure we can do much about it. I doubt your large NOT IN was relevant --- more likely it'd be something associated with inter-process interactions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: