Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26306.1223928219@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM
stuff
Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Two different buildfarm machines are currently showing the same failure: > ERROR: could not fsync segment 0 of relation 1663/16384/29270/1: No such file or directory > ERROR: checkpoint request failed Some tests show that when the serial regression tests are run in a freshly initdb'd installation, HEAD assigns OID 29270 to "bmscantest" in the bitmapops test. So that's been dropped some time before the failure occurs; which means that this isn't a narrow-window race condition; which raises the question of why we're not seeing it on more machines. I notice now that kudu and dragonfly are actually the same machine ... could this be an OS-specific problem? Kris, has there been any system-software change on that machine recently? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: