Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26274.930418079@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Just don't run bigtest. It is only for people who are having trouble > with the new numeric type. I don't mind too much that bigtest takes forever --- as you say, it shouldn't be run except by people who want a thorough test. But I *am* unhappy that the regular numeric test takes much longer than all the other regression tests put together. That's an unreasonable amount of effort spent on one feature, and it gets really annoying for someone like me who's in the habit of running the regress tests after any update. Is there anything this test is likely to catch that wouldn't get caught with a much narrower field width (say 10 digits instead of 30)? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: