Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time

> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> > 
> > > SAKAIDA wrote: 
> > >    However, I think that there is no necessity of calculating the 
> > > value of 1000 digits in the 'LOG' function.  
> > > 
> > 
> > numeric/decimal is a new type for this release.  I assume this extra
> > processing will be removed once we are sure it works.
> 
>    Thank you for your reply. At the next version, I hope that
> 'regression test/bigtest' ends in the short time. 
> 
>    The patch as an example which I considered is the following.
> If this patch is applied, the processing which requires 1.5 hours
> in the current ends for 5 minutes.

Just don't run bigtest.  It is only for people who are having trouble
with the new numeric type.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026