Re: Is the "x ms" info reliable?
От | Melvin Davidson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is the "x ms" info reliable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 259439920.2681241.1421530027819.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10689.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is the "x ms" info reliable? (hushthatbush@hushmail.com) |
Список | pgadmin-support |
Have you tried using the "Explain analyze" function (Shift-F7)?
That's what it's for.
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
www.folkalley.com
From: "hushthatbush@hushmail.com" <hushthatbush@hushmail.com>
To: "pgadmin-support@postgresql.org" <pgadmin-support@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 3:13 PM
Subject: [pgadmin-support] Is the "x ms" info reliable?
In the query window's bottom-right corner, after running a query, it says how long it took. It's ambiguous how exactly this is is calculated. It seems to not take into account the lag from the slow-ass SSH tunnel.
Basically, I wanna know how fast the command *actually* is. Not how long it took to run and then get delivered to pgAdmin via the incredibly sluggish SSH tunnel. The actual, in-app query is run on the same machine, and should be much, much faster.
Is it possible to get this "real time" rather than the "pointless time"?
PS: I hate the command-line psql tool and I don't want anything to do with it.
Basically, I wanna know how fast the command *actually* is. Not how long it took to run and then get delivered to pgAdmin via the incredibly sluggish SSH tunnel. The actual, in-app query is run on the same machine, and should be much, much faster.
Is it possible to get this "real time" rather than the "pointless time"?
PS: I hate the command-line psql tool and I don't want anything to do with it.
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: